WebIn quantitative risk management, the elicitability of a risk measure is closely related to comparative backtesting procedures. ... While this discussion has mainly focused on the … WebIn this note, we comment on the relevance of elicitability for backtesting risk measure estimates. In particular, we propose the use of Diebold-Mariano tests, and show how they can be implemented for Expected Shortfall (ES), based on the recent result of Fissler and Ziegel (2015) that ES is jointly elicitable with Value at Risk. Suggested Citation
Risk Measures: Robustness, Elicitability, and Backtesting
WebOn the elicitability of range value at risk. The debate of which quantitative risk measure to choose in practice has mainly focused on the dichotomy between value at risk (VaR) … WebApr 12, 2024 · Range Value at Risk (RVaR) is a two-parameter class of quantile-based risk measures. It is the conditional expectation of the loss when it lies between two values of VaR, for levels p and q, where 0 great falls easter buffet
(PDF) Risk Management with Expectiles - ResearchGate
WebSep 25, 2024 · Range value at risk (RVaR) is a natural interpolation between VaR and ES, constituting a tradeoff between the sensitivity of ES and the robustness of VaR, turning it … WebDec 5, 2013 · There is no sufficient evidence to justify an all-inclusive replacement of ES by Expectiles in applications, especially as this paper provides an alternative way for backtesting of ES. Expected Shortfall (ES) has been widely accepted as a risk measure that is conceptually superior to Value-at-Risk (VaR). At the same time, however, it has been … WebSystemic risk measures such as CoVaR, CoES and MES are widely-used in finance, macroeconomics and by regulatory bodies. Despite their importance, we show that they fail to be elicitable and identifiable. This renders forecast comparison and validation, commonly summarised as `backtesting', impossible. great falls electric